Fri05182012

God Shuts Up a Fool (Part 1)

  • PDF

The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God”. They are cor­rupt, they have done abominable works, there is none who does good. Psalms 14: 1. While searching for materials for this week’s column, I came across this interesting story sent by a friend. It happened in a class­room taught by an atheist teacher of Philosophy who encounters two God-believing students. Ac­cording to the Bible, a person who denies the existence of God is a fool, that he is corrupt, and can do nothing good.

After reading the story, we can make our own conclusions. Make the story our own, because Chris­tians should be able to give an an­swer for our faith sooner or later. This is why everyone who profess­es to believe in God should study his or her Bible diligently every day and pray that God will give her or him wisdom and courage to stand for what he or she believes.

‘The atheist professor of Phi­losophy pauses before his class and then asks one of his new stu­dents to stand. ‘You’re a Christian, aren’t you, son?’ ‘Yes sir,’ the stu­dent says. ‘So you believe in God?’ ‘Absolutely.’ ‘Is God good?’ ‘Sure! God’s good.’ ‘Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?’ ‘Yes’ ‘Are you good or evil?’ ‘The Bible says I’m evil.’ The pro­fessor grins knowingly. ‘Aha! The
Bible! He considers for a moment. ‘Here’s one for you. Let’s say there’s a sick person over here and you can cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?’ ‘Yes sir, I would.’ ‘So you’re good...!’ ‘I wouldn’t say that.’ ‘But why not say that? You’d help a sick and maimed person if you could. Most of us would if we could. But God doesn’t.’

The student does not answer, so the professor continues. ‘He doesn’t, does He? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even though he prayed to Jesus to heal him. How is this Jesus good? Can you answer that one?’

The student remains silent. ‘No, you can’t, can you?’ the pro­fessor says. He takes a sip of water from a glass on his desk to give the student time to relax. ‘Let’s start again, young fella. Is God good?’ ‘Er, yes,’ the student says. ‘Is Sa­tan good?’ The student doesn’t hesitate on this one. ‘No.’ ‘Then where does Satan come from?’ The student falters. ‘From God’ ‘That’s right. God made Satan, didn’t he? Tell me, son. Is there Evil in this world?’ ‘Yes, sir.’ ‘Evil’s everywhere, isn’t it? And God did make everything, correct?’ ‘Ye s’ ‘So who creat­ed evil?’ The professor continued, ‘If God created everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil.’ Again, the student has no answer. ‘Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?’ The student squirms on his feet. ‘Yes.’ ‘So who created them?’

The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question. ‘Who created them?’ There is still no answer. Suddenly the lecturer breaks away to pace in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized. ‘Tell me,’ he continues onto another student.. ‘Do you believe in Jesus Christ, son?’

The student’s voice betrays him and cracks. ‘Yes, professor, I do.’ The old man stops pacing. ‘Science says you have five senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?’ ‘No, sir, I’ve never seen Him.’ ‘Then tell us if you’ve ever heard your Jesus?’ ‘No, sir, I have not.’ ‘Have you ev­er felt your Jesus, tasted your Je­sus or smelled your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory percep­tion of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?’ ‘No, sir, I’m afraid I haven’t.’ ‘Yet you still believe in him?’ ‘Yes’ ‘According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstra­ble protocol, science says your God doesn’t exist. What do you say to that, Son?’ ‘Nothing,’ the student replies. ‘I only have my faith.’ ‘Yes, faith,’ the professor repeats. ‘And that is the problem science has with God. There is no evidence, only faith.’

The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a ques­tion of his own. ‘Professor, is there such thing as heat?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘And is there such a thing as cold?’ ‘Yes, son, there’s cold too.’ ‘No sir, there isn’t.’

The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room suddenly becomes very qui­et. The student begins to explain. ‘You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but we don’t have anything called ‘cold’. We can hit down to 458 degrees below zero, which is no heat, but we can’t go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than the lowest -458 degrees. Everybody or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the ab­sence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in ther­mal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it.’

Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the class­room, sounding like a hammer. ‘What about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing as darkness?’ ‘Yes,’ the professor replies with­out hesitation. ‘What is night if it isn’t darkness?’

‘You’re wrong again, sir. Dark­ness is not something; it is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light, but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it’s called dark­ness, isn’t it? That’s the meaning we use to define the word. In re­ality, darkness isn’t. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn’t you?’

The  professor  begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be a good semester. ‘So what point are you making, young man?’ ‘Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed.’ The professor’s face cannot hide his surprise this time. ‘Flawed? Can you explain how?’

‘You are working on the premise of duality,’ the student explains. ‘You argue that there is life and then there’s death; a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can’t even explain a thought.’ ‘It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substan­tive thing. Death is not the oppo­site of life, just the absence of it.’