And then just as we went to press, it was reported that impeachment proceedings against the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has been implemented at the House of Representatives and is now going to the Senate for its approval.
In the midst of all these, critics of the administration and political observers have quickly labeled these moves as draconian measures by President Noy Aquino to cripple the judiciary – a move that provoked warnings of an eminent dictatorship. Within one week alone, three significant events happened which on the surface were normal except that one is lead to speculate that it is all inter-related.
On Dec.12, a new Archbishop was installed in Manila to replace the retiring Cardinal Gaudencio Rosales. Archbishop Luis Antonio Tagle of Imus, Cavite takes over as the titular head of the Philippine Church, admittedly a powerful player in Philippine politics.
Yet, President Aquino chooses to ‘snub’ the ceremonies opting instead to attend the Philippine Army’s change of command ceremonies, prompting a prominent bishop to launch an attack. It is well known that the administration and the church is on a collision course about the pending Reproductive Health Bill which is vehemently opposed by the church for its allegedly pro-abortion provisions. At one point, there were rumours that Aquino would be excommunicated for his support of the bill.
Aquino’s conspicuous absence at the Archbishop’s installation could also be interpreted as a sign of obeisance to the Army, which could mean the difference between staying in power in case of an uprising. A day after the installation, it was announced that Chief Justice Renato Corona would be impeached. Corona is widely associated with President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo who appointed him to the position amidst opposition by Aquino who charged that it was a ‘midnight appointment’ and unconstitutional.
On Nov. 22, the Supreme Court decided to strip the Aquinos of Hacienda Luisita and directed the owners to distribute the land to their rightful owners – the farmers who tilled the land. The decision by the Court is seen as a defeat of the President’s family who have owned the Hacienda for years and fought to have it exempted from land reform.
Maybe we will see the day when a former President will finally be convicted, albeit not for the killings committed with impunity during her term but for corruption. The dictator Marcos was toppled by People Power and cheated prosecution by fleeing to Hawaii until his death. Estrada was toppled by another so-called People Power and eventually convicted of corruption.
This is the first time in history that a former President and a sitting Congresswoman is actually arrested and imprisoned. Let this be a lesson for future leaders that they can be held answerable for their misdeeds while in office. Just look at the European and Arab leaders who have capitulated. - Ted Alcuitas
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|





