Discrimination Redefined

  • Page Views 4030
  • There was a time when discrimination meant the “unjust or prejudicial treatment of a group of people based on their race, age or sex.” Now, everyone simply cries, “Discrimination!” at every moment they feel they have been “oppressed” in any way. This is very evident in the way teens loosely use the word “racist” when someone exclaims an obvious deviance from the norm, which is sometimes factual, nonetheless, becomes prejudicial because it involves a person who isn’t white, straight or intelligent.

    I always tell my students to call a cat a cat, and a dog a dog. What society has taught us to do with being too politically correct is to put words into other people’s mouths, even if they just meant to tell the truth. Today, no one likes to hear the truth. If one does state the truth, they will be called discriminatory, prejudicial or simply, a “racist”, even if they were not even talking about anything that resembles an argument on race.

    In the wake of the shootings in Orlando, people took the courage to donate blood to hospitals to assist the wounded. They flocked to blood donation centres, only to find out that if you are a man who has sex with another man (MSM), you are not allowed to donate blood unless your last sexual intercourse was 12 months ago. This is a policy set in the US to ensure that blood donated to the banks are clear of the HIV/AIDS virus that is transmittable through sexual intercourse with several partners, in particular men with other men. A number of  LGBTQ groups have been screaming discrimination for not being allowed to donate blood on the basis of their sexuality. It’s another battle they’re waging on the entire human race because of the choices they made.

    The Canadian Blood Services (CBS) has a similar policy and has reduced  its wait period from never to five years to 12 months. Aside from this, their lengthy questionnaire also asks if the donor has been engaged in sex with a commercial sex worker, and other high risk sexual behaviours. The CBS wants to assure the public that the blood that is donated is not tainted with the disease and can protect both the donor and the recipient; however, CBS also admits that screening for HIV/AIDS or other transmittable diseases through the blood is not 100% accurate, and the 12-month period can help determine eligibility, but cannot assure it to be disease-free.

    While it seems heroic to donate blood, have people who have high-risk sexual behaviours thought about the consequences of giving tainted blood to an otherwise healthy person, and after a few years find out that they had a transmittable disease that they transferred to someone else just because they wanted to feel good about themselves by donating blood?

    In the future, when I am in need of a blood transfusion, do I have the Canadian right to ask where the blood came from, knowing that testing for accuracy of non-tainted blood is “not 100%”? The answer is a flat no, unless I want a whole group of people screaming “Discrimination!” at my deathbed for refusing the transfusion. If  one thinks about it, we, the receiver, seem to have no choice anymore, and we have to agree to a policy we didn’t choose in the first place, simply because the government did not want to protect its citizens, even if scientific studies have proven the fact that it cannot detect any disease accurately. Well, the Liberal government has a reputation for wanting what is popular, and not necessarily efficient, just like their standard-bearer.

    The 12-month wait period for people with high-risk sexual behaviours to donate blood should not be misconstrued as discrimination. It is to safeguard (of sorts!) the health  of every human being, from the smallest infant to the oldest person, and prevent the spread of disease such as HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, and others.

    It’s not discrimination. It’s science.

    Share

    New Posts Recently publish post More

    • 15 January 2019
      9 hours ago No comment

      Pacquiao odds-on favourite in January 19 fight with Broner

      LLAMADO! Manny Pacquiao is the bookmakers’ pick to win in his January 19 fight with American boxer Adrien Broner in Las Vegas. The site bookmaker.eu has reported that opening boxing lines at Bookmaker Sportsbook put the seasoned Pacquiao (-250 ) versus Broner ( +210 ). “The current boxing line ...

    • 13 January 2019
      2 days ago No comment

      Pacquiao vs Broner Tale of the Tape

      WBA Welterweight Championship – January 19, 2019 – Las Vegas, USA Related

    • 11 January 2019
      4 days ago No comment

      The Predator (PG)

      Hide and Kill! Hide and seek is a classic kid’s game. Add an alien who’s not quite of the E.T. mould and odds are good something bad may happen. Something evil comes your way in The Predator. Even the name sounds haunting as 20th Century Fox goes all in ...

    • 11 January 2019
      4 days ago No comment

      ABS-CBN unveils state-of-the-art soundstages

      MANILA, PHILIPPINES – As the TV and film industries become more globalized, production has also become peripatetic, travelling place to place, claimed Variety a couple of years back. In the recent years, the world has seen either the massive upgrades or rise of new studios and soundstages that offer ...

    • 11 January 2019
      4 days ago No comment

      Fil-Am Darren Criss dedicates Golden Globes win to Cebuana mother

      MANILA, Philippines — Filipino American Actor Darren Criss took home the Golden Globe Award for Best Performance by an Actor in a Limited Series or a Motion Picture Made for Television on Sunday evening (California time). He thanked his Cebuana mother during his acceptance speech. “As we’ve seen, it’s ...

    %d bloggers like this: