I’m aware that a number of sports commentators have cast doubts on the victory of Pacquiao. I’m not very surprised with this because many are perhaps used to seeing the Filipino boxing champ score always spectacular wins over his opponents. As a former boxer myself who had competed internationally and in the Olympics, I know from what I witnessed that Pacquiao indeed triumphed over his Mexican foe. I have also coached national boxers in the Philippines, and I think I have an eye for these things.
The facts cannot lie. In my own personal scorecard, Pacquiao won by a slim margin. If the fight was very close, the judges, with all their wisdom and candor, would naturally award the fight to the champion.
The challenger must be the one to press the fight and he cannot expect to grab the crown by just refusing to mix it up and wait for the final bell. He must exert extra efforts to at least lead by a mile and convince the judges he did his best and unloaded his best shots to upstage the defending champion.
I suggest that Marquez reviews the way how his corner called the fight. I understand that during the match, he was constantly told by his trainer-coach that he was leading. This could probably explain why the Mexican fighter seemed to have played a defensive stance in the last rounds, rather than going all the way.
It is almost always the case that in high-stakes boxing competitions, the prize is given to the reigning champion if the fight is very close. Challengers need to demonstrate that they have dominated the fight.
Having said these, I tip my hat to Marquez for his big heart. There can only be one winner, and no doubt it was Pacquiao.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



